The state court then overruled its original decision striking down the state’s new congressional maps as extreme partisan gerrymanders. After the 2022 midterm elections, the composition of the North Carolina Supreme Court changed from Democratic to Republican control. What happened in the Moore case, which comes out of North Carolina, is a good example.
Elenis case is the latest example of a decades-long pattern in which the bar for ‘sincerely held’ beliefs has fallen.īut more is needed. Opinion Opinion: The Supreme Court is making religion an all-purpose excuse for ignoring the law The court’s ruling in Moore should make state courts less wary of curbing state legislative abuses and deter state legislators from crossing lines in the first place. This envelope-pushing behavior by state legislators was, in part, a response to lax judicial oversight. And, as in North Carolina, they have drawn extreme partisan gerrymanders that prevent fair representation. They have also sought to undermine the ability of the people to exercise their power through direct democracy. They have pursued partisan efforts to disempower other elected offices. State lawmakers have passed laws to manipulate election processes and subvert election outcomes. In the 10 years since the Shelby County decision, at least 29 states have passed 94 restrictive voting laws.
READ DAILY NATION NEWSPAPER ONLINE FREE CODE
That shouldn’t be a partisan issueĪ bipartisan bill would require a code of conduct for justices and create a process for complaints against justices to be filed and investigated. Opinion Editorial: The Supreme Court needs ethics reform. In a slew of other cases, the court has eviscerated other key protections in federal law and made it harder for Americans to get relief from discrimination, gerrymandering and burdens on their freedom to vote. The country is still experiencing the resulting deluge of new state laws rolling back voting access. Holder, the decision in which the court gutted the heart of the federal Voting Rights Act. This week marks the 10th anniversary of Shelby County vs. While the Tuesday decision affirms that our longstanding state checks and balances apply to federal elections, it does not undo the significant harm the Supreme Court has done to voting rights and fair elections over the last two decades. That these cases made it all the way up to the court reflects how much the court has been open to radically rewriting the law - as it did to reproductive rights and gun safety – in voting rights. Both cases were exercises in brinksmanship. But these cases shouldn’t have come before the Supreme Court in the first place. Milligan, the court declined to reverse the 40-year-old Voting Rights Act test for discrimination in redistricting. This is the second case this term that the Supreme Court pulled back from the brink on voting rights and elections. Instead of sowing chaos, this decision leaves the state and federal courts in a position to protect voting rights and democracy - if they’re willing to do so. It would also have supercharged efforts to sabotage elections and empowered state legislatures to abuse their election powers. If the court had veered in the other direction, it would have upended centuries of election law and practice on the eve of a contentious contest. The 2024 elections are around the corner.
The decision to put the independent state legislature theory to rest has come in the nick of time.
READ DAILY NATION NEWSPAPER ONLINE FREE FREE
The court did not articulate a standard to apply in those cases, but it made clear that federal court action would be limited to the rare case where state courts “exceeded the bounds of ordinary judicial review.” And it made clear that state legislatures are not free to go rogue. In this episode, Sara Beysolow Nyanti reflects on the mounting climate threat, prospects for peace, and retaining hope in one of the world’s most dangerous places.To be sure, the Supreme Court still claimed the power for federal courts to review state court decisions concerning federal elections in extreme circumstances. Floods have hit many areas, forcing locals to share dry land with deadly snakes. Reeling from decades of conflict, South Sudan is now suffering the devastating impacts of climate change. My heart was crying while she was speaking … I couldn't bear it.” “This woman we have nightmares … And she talked about losing her four children and she said it without crying. As Former Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator in South Sudan, she often encountered the anguish of those bearing the psychological scars of war. Growing up in Liberia, Sara Beysolow Nyanti is no stranger to the lasting pain of a country ravaged by recurring violence. “How can I not have sleepless nights when you have to choose between whether you fund the services for gender-based violence, or whether you fund the services for food, because for some children, it's only that one meal in school that they have all day.”
0 kommentar(er)
